Project Big Picture came with significant strings attached. But the plan struck at one of the sorest points in the game: the power of the big clubs and of their even bigger owners-and the erosion of any sense of fairness and competition as a result. ![]() Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the plan was “exactly the type of backroom dealing that undermines trust in football’s governance.” For Americans-including the owners of both Liverpool and Manchester United-that might seem incomprehensible. ![]() The Premier League’s official response to the proposal was swift and unambiguous: “In the Premier League’s view, a number of the individual proposals in the plan published today could have a damaging impact on the whole game.” Even U.K. On Twitter, a torrent of unprintable abuse erupted, aimed at the would-be benefactors. This might seem like a generous proposal, but it caused an immediate and aggressive reaction. ![]() The plan involved a 250 million-pound ($334 million) rescue fund for the smaller clubs affected by the COVID-19 crisis in addition, the dominant English Premier League would increase revenue share transfers to the three lower divisions from 8 percent to 25 percent. Last October, with stadiums emptied by the COVID-19 pandemic and revenues plunging for sports leagues, news broke of Project Big Picture: a radical plan to restructure English soccer proposed by the country’s two biggest clubs-Liverpool and Manchester United.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |